A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Court - December 13, 2012

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 14:26, August 19, 2013 by Abassos@mpdlaw.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Abassos • December 13, 2012 • no comments

Admissions of a Party Opponent - Dependency

The out-of-court sexual abuse allegations of a child are not admissible as statements of a party opponent, against father, in a dependency proceeding. OEC 801(4)(b)(A), declaring statements of a party opponent to be non-hearsay, only applies when one party is offering another party's statements against that same party and adverse to a position that party has taken in the proceedings. The child's statements could theoretically be offered by the state against the child, but not against father. DHS v GDW