U.S. Supreme Court - June 17, 2013

by: Zara Lukens and Abassos • June 17, 2013 • no comments

Any fact that increases the mandatory minimum constitutes an element

Overruling Harris v. United States, the court finds that an increase in the mandatory minimum sentence constitutes an “element” that must be submitted to the jury. Prior to this decision, an increase in the statutory maximum triggered Apprendi, but an increase in the mandatory minimum did not. Here, the jury form did not indicate that the firearm was “brandished,” but the presentence report recommended a 7-year sentence, consistent with the defendant having brandished the weapon. Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S.__(2013).