A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Ct - July 9, 2015

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Abassos • July 9, 2015 • no comments

(Created page with "<summary hidden> * </summary> Non-Criminal Stops - An Officer May Not Inquire About Weapons Unless There's Reasonable Suspicion of an Immediate Threat An officer may not inq...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Non-Criminal Stops - An Officer May Not Inquire About Weapons Unless There's Reasonable Suspicion of an Immediate Threat
 
Non-Criminal Stops - An Officer May Not Inquire About Weapons Unless There's Reasonable Suspicion of an Immediate Threat
  
An officer may not inquire about weapons during a routine traffic stop, absent reasonable suspicion that the suspect poses an immediate threat of serious injury to the officer.
+
An officer may not inquire about weapons during a routine traffic stop unless (1) it is reasonably related to and reasonably necessary to effectuate the stop, (2) there is reasonable suspicion of an immediate threat of serious physical injury to the officer, or (3) reasonable suspicion of a crime has developed. The court rejects the state's argument that an inquiry regarding weapons is reasonably necessary to effectuate every stop and, therefore, always permissible. For a weapons inquiry conducted in the course of a traffic investigation to be reasonably related to that investi- gation and reasonably necessary to effectuate it, an officer must have reasonable, circumstance-specific concerns for the officer’s safety or the safety of other persons who are present.

Revision as of 17:47, July 10, 2015

Non-Criminal Stops - An Officer May Not Inquire About Weapons Unless There's Reasonable Suspicion of an Immediate Threat

An officer may not inquire about weapons during a routine traffic stop unless (1) it is reasonably related to and reasonably necessary to effectuate the stop, (2) there is reasonable suspicion of an immediate threat of serious physical injury to the officer, or (3) reasonable suspicion of a crime has developed. The court rejects the state's argument that an inquiry regarding weapons is reasonably necessary to effectuate every stop and, therefore, always permissible. For a weapons inquiry conducted in the course of a traffic investigation to be reasonably related to that investi- gation and reasonably necessary to effectuate it, an officer must have reasonable, circumstance-specific concerns for the officer’s safety or the safety of other persons who are present.