< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Unfortunately, the high Court isn't taking up the unanimous jury issue this time around. [http://www.scotusblog.com They didn't grant certiorari] in ''Herrera v Oregon''. However, as Bronson says in the following 5 minute video, most experts, including him, think it's only a matter of time and the right case. He predicted they would deny cert. in Herrera but still believes that you ought to be preserving the issue in every case. Bronson also has an idea, set forth below, about how to create the sort of case the Court wants.
| |
| | | | |
| − | All the documents and arguments on [[/content/unanimous-jury-issue unanimous juries are here]]. The unanimous jury issue is not dead. This isn't over.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <div class="media_embed">
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [http://vimeo.com/18518542 Bronson James on Unanimous Juries] from [http://vimeo.com/user3764779 Alex Bassos] on [http://vimeo.com Vimeo].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [vimeo vimeo.com/18518542]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| − | {{wl-publish: 2011-01-09 21:00:00 -0800 | abassos }}
| |
Latest revision as of 21:23, January 22, 2013
