A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Relative and Absolute Proportionality

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

by: Ryan • September 4, 2011 • no comments

(Importing text file)
 
(Importing text file)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Case law on what the paper calls "relative proportionality" is more fully developed under the Oregon Constitution, as evidenced most recently by the Oregon Court of Appeals decision in ''State v. Simonson''.
 
Case law on what the paper calls "relative proportionality" is more fully developed under the Oregon Constitution, as evidenced most recently by the Oregon Court of Appeals decision in ''State v. Simonson''.
  
At [/6_Crimes_With_Proportionality_Problems:_Revisiting_Them_in_Light_of_the_Simonson_Opinion this post], you'll find a list of as-yet unaddressed issues involving proportionality and Oregon law. Relative proportionality is implicated in charges ranging from Online Sexual Corruption to Theft by Receiving to ID Theft to misdemeanor probation revocations.
+
At [[Blog:Main/6_Crimes_With_Proportionality_Problems:_Revisiting_Them_in_Light_of_the_Simonson_Opinion|6 Crimes with Proportionality Problems]] , you'll find a list of as-yet unaddressed issues involving proportionality and Oregon law. Relative proportionality is implicated in charges ranging from Online Sexual Corruption to Theft by Receiving to ID Theft to misdemeanor probation revocations.
  
 
You may not need them, but it can't hurt to add a few sentences on the 8th Amendment, if you find the paper referenced at Sentencing Law and Policy blog at all convincing.
 
You may not need them, but it can't hurt to add a few sentences on the 8th Amendment, if you find the paper referenced at Sentencing Law and Policy blog at all convincing.
 
{{wl-publish: 2011-09-04 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }}
 
{{wl-publish: 2011-09-04 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }}

Revision as of 19:05, December 21, 2012

At Sentencing Law and Policy blog, a recent post quotes a paper on proportionality under the 8th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Case law on what the paper calls "relative proportionality" is more fully developed under the Oregon Constitution, as evidenced most recently by the Oregon Court of Appeals decision in State v. Simonson.

At 6 Crimes with Proportionality Problems , you'll find a list of as-yet unaddressed issues involving proportionality and Oregon law. Relative proportionality is implicated in charges ranging from Online Sexual Corruption to Theft by Receiving to ID Theft to misdemeanor probation revocations.

You may not need them, but it can't hurt to add a few sentences on the 8th Amendment, if you find the paper referenced at Sentencing Law and Policy blog at all convincing.