Oregon Appellate Ct - Oct 26, 2016
by: Sara Werboff • October 28, 2016 • no comments
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A158964.pdf State v. Davis], 281 Or App 855 (2016) (Shorr, J.) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A158964.pdf State v. Davis], 281 Or App 855 (2016) (Shorr, J.) | ||
| + | Juvenile Dependency - Lack of Service of Dependency Petition | ||
| + | |||
| + | The juvenile court erred when it entered a combined jurisdictional and dispositional judgment at a hearing where mother did not appear and had not been properly served with the summons and dependency petition. DHS concedes that the juvenile court erred in proceeding with the case in her absence and the court reverses both the jurisdictional and dispositional judgment for both mother and father. | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161909.pdf DHS v. C.M.R.], 281 Or App 886 (2016) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161909.pdf DHS v. C.M.R.], 281 Or App 886 (2016) (per curiam) | ||
Revision as of 14:00, October 29, 2016
State v. Donathan, 281 Or App 781 (2016) (Armstrong, P.J.)
State v. G.A.K., 281 Or App 815 (2016) (Sercombe, P.J.)
State v. Netzler, 281 Or App 822 (2016) (Sercombe, P.J.)
State v. Henley, 281 Or App 825 (2016) (Egan, J.)
State v. Holloway, 281 Or App 837 (2016) (Tookey, J.)
State v. Davis, 281 Or App 855 (2016) (Shorr, J.)
Juvenile Dependency - Lack of Service of Dependency Petition
The juvenile court erred when it entered a combined jurisdictional and dispositional judgment at a hearing where mother did not appear and had not been properly served with the summons and dependency petition. DHS concedes that the juvenile court erred in proceeding with the case in her absence and the court reverses both the jurisdictional and dispositional judgment for both mother and father.
DHS v. C.M.R., 281 Or App 886 (2016) (per curiam)
