Will SCOTUS Look At Whether an Outstanding Warrant Cures a Bad Stop?
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • November 25, 2011 • no comments
(Importing text file) |
m (Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}") |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'd posted on this previously. I bring it up again because the decision whether to accept ''cert ''will likely be announced on Monday. | I'd posted on this previously. I bring it up again because the decision whether to accept ''cert ''will likely be announced on Monday. | ||
− | {{wl-publish: 2011-11-25 21:00:00 -0800 | Ryan }} | + | {{wl-publish: 2011-11-25 21:00:00 -0800 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} |
Latest revision as of 12:06, August 10, 2013
In the petition for cert in Faulkner v. US, the question presented is:
Whether discovery by the police of an outstanding arrest warrant during a concededly unconstitutional seizure of a person purges the taint of the illegal seizure, permitting the government to introduce at trial evidence obtained as a direct consequence of an arrest on the outstanding warrant?
The relevant briefs can be found here. You just may need to scroll down a bit.
I'd posted on this previously. I bring it up again because the decision whether to accept cert will likely be announced on Monday.