Oregon Supreme Court - February 7, 2013
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Jwestover and Abassos • February 7, 2013 • no comments
(Created page with "Judge Censured It is a violation of the Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct for a judge to call the defendant a “piece of shit” and say that he “personally hopes that [Defe...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Judge Censured | + | '''Circuit Court Judge Censured''' |
It is a violation of the Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct for a judge to call the defendant a “piece of shit” and say that he “personally hopes that [Defendant] rots in prison.” Specifically, it is a violation of: | It is a violation of the Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct for a judge to call the defendant a “piece of shit” and say that he “personally hopes that [Defendant] rots in prison.” Specifically, it is a violation of: | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
''In re Barnack'', __ Or ___ (Feb. 7, 2013) (per curiam). | ''In re Barnack'', __ Or ___ (Feb. 7, 2013) (per curiam). | ||
+ | {{wl-publish: 2013-02-07 13:59:18 -0800 | Jwestover }} |
Revision as of 14:59, February 8, 2013
Circuit Court Judge Censured
It is a violation of the Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct for a judge to call the defendant a “piece of shit” and say that he “personally hopes that [Defendant] rots in prison.” Specifically, it is a violation of:
- “JR1-101(A) (judge shall observe high standards of conduct so that integrity, impartiality, and independence of the judiciary are preserved)”, and
- “JR 1-101(C) (judge shall not engage in conduct that reflects adversely on the judge’s character, competence, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge).”
In re Barnack, __ Or ___ (Feb. 7, 2013) (per curiam).