OCDLA Library of Defense - Latest Case Reviews

Blog How Should I Start Jury Selection? The Court of Appeals Just Told Me. by: Henry Oostrom-Shah • August 17, 2025 • no comments How should I start jury selection? The Court of Appeals just told me—and maybe you, too. Yes, you heard that right. As a new guy who graduated law school in 2023, I’ve often struggled with breaking the ice during jury selection—and doing so in a way that advances my trial theory. Thankfully, the Court of Appeals (O’Connor, J.) just released an opinion that tells trial lawyers how to pick a jury. Specifically, the opinion in State v. Pugh suggests how we can set up voir dire to ensure the trial judge strikes unfriendly jurors. 341 Or. App. 435, 439–40 (2025). And, if the trial judge denies our for-cause challenges, how we can get the appellate court to reverse a guilty verdict. Pugh reminds us to sprint to bias as soon as we stand up in front of the panel. → continue reading... Primer on Preserving As Applied Challenges to Gun Laws by: Henry Oostrom-Shah • July 30, 2025 • no comments The State has charged your client with felon in possession of a firearm where their only felonies are old or non-violent crimes. File a pre-trial motion to dismiss. Demand a hearing. At that hearing, show the judge that your client is no longer a danger to others. Call witnesses to talk about how safe and law-abiding your client is. Bring in employment, treatment, and schooling records. Talk about the lack of subsequent violent criminal history. Because your client is no longer a danger, they still have a constitutional right to bear arms. More follows below, including helpful federal and state cases to support your arguments. → continue reading... Does the Lack of a Mental State Render Most Major Sex Crimes Unconstitutional? by: Ryan Scott • July 17, 2025 • no comments The Oregon Supreme Court is going to hear argument in September in the case of State v. Monaco. The conviction was for felony murder. One of the "questions presented and proposed rules of law" identified in the opening brief is as follows: Third Question Presented. Does ORS 163.115(1)(b), Oregon’s felony murder statute, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? Proposed Rule of Law. This court has interpreted ORS 163.115(1)(b) as creating a presumption of a culpable mental state for the causation-of-death element of felony murder, by the defendant’s commission or attempted commission of the underlying felony. Such a legal presumption violates due process because it is inconsistent with the presumption of innocence, relieves the state of its burden to prove every element of the offense, and invades the province of the jury. In the alternative, it violates due process by establishing a strict-liability offense for a violent felony. My question, which is in the larval stage of development, is this: Are any of the constitutional principles on which the Monaco argument relies applicable to major sex crimes where no mental state at all applies to the element that makes a defendant guilty (the age of the victim in a Jessica's Law case) or where no mental state applies but the defendant has the ability to raise an affirmative mental state defense (sex with a sleepy or intoxicated person)? → continue reading... Next 20 Articles Case Reviews Oregon Court of Appeals, August 20th, 2025 by: Rankin Johnson EVIDENCE - Toolmarks in firearms SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety CLOSING ARGUMENT - Improper argument by prosecutor → read the full summaries... Oregon Court of Appeals, August 13th, 2025 by: Rankin Johnson EVIDENCE - Other bad acts → read the full summaries... Oregon Court of Appeals, August 6th, 2025 by: Rankin Johnson EVIDENCE - Other bad acts SENTENCING - Open court DUII - FSTs JURY INSTRUCTIONS - Witnesses SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Particularity HEARSAY AND CONFRONTATION - Statements against interest EVIDENCE - Other bad acts → read the full summaries... Oregon Supreme Court, July 31st, 2025 by: Rankin Johnson SENTENCING - Consecutive sentences → read the full summaries... Oregon Court of Appeals, July 30th, 2025 by: Rankin Johnson CONTEMPT - Sufficiency CONTEMPT - Defenses JURY SELECTION - Improper statements by prosecutor → read the full summaries... _________________________

RECENT LOD UPDATES Post-Conviction_Relief Civil_Commitments DUII DWI Driving_under_the_influence_of_intoxicants DUI Driving_While_Intoxicated Driving_Under_the_Influence BUII Webinars_and_Podcasts Defending_Sex_Cases_Manual_TOC Appointing_Counsel/Informing_of_Rights Interpreters Joinder_of_Charges Joinder/Severance Severing_Joined_Defendants Qualifying_Stages_of_Criminal_Prosecution Parental_Rights_Proceedings Post-Conviction_Proceedings Right_to_Counsel Due_Process_Clause Remedial_Sanction_Hearings Partial_Denial_of_Counsel Rights_Before_Submitting_to_Chemical_Testing Jury_Instructions ________________________________________________ Search and Seizure Privacy Interest, Stops,Arrests, Consent, Warrant Exceptions, Suppression Exceptions, Search Warrants Forensic Science Ballistics, Bitemarks, Bloodstains, DNA, Eyewitness ID, Fingerprints, Handwriting ID, Polygraphs, Shaken Baby Evidence Code Procedure, Relevance, Privileges, Lay Witnesses, Experts, Hearsay, Physical Evidence Immigration Padilla, Agg Felonies, Inadmissibility, Removability, Moral Turpitude, Naturalization, Juveniles, U-Visas Crimes Measure 11, Drugs, Sex Crimes, Homicide, Property, DUII, Child Abuse, Other Crimes Self Incrimination Evidentiary Burdens, State Compulsion, Custody/Compelling Circumstances, Right to Silence, Impeachment Mental States Civil Commitments, Aid & Assist, GEI, Disordered Mental State, Mens Rea, Testing, DSM-IV Defenses Alibi, Necessity, Speedy Trial, Self Defense Oregon Constitution Speedy Trial, Right to Counsel, Confrontation, Double Jeopardy, Equal Privileges, Ex Post Facto, Venue |Trial Procedure Charging Decision, Discovery, Right to Counsel, Pretrial Motions Extradition Veterans and Military Service Created by Jess Barton. Sentencing Criminal Episodes,Merger, Consecutive Sentences, Mandatory Minimums, Probation, Restitution, Collateral Consequences