are you arguing for merger of reckless endangering and assault II or III?
From OCDLA Library of Defense
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • September 25, 2012 • one comment
Car accident. Named victim of reckless endangering is the named victim of the assault. Assume it's an assault II or III. Are you -- if you're an attorney -- arguing for merger, and if so, what kind of results are you getting? If you're an appellate attorney, are you seeing this argument made, and if not, do you seek merger as plain error?
E-mail me with your answer and I'll publish the results in a subsequent post.
