A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "User:Ryan"

From OCDLA Library of Defense
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* 05/08/13 | [[Blog:Main/Arguments_No_One_Would_Be_Stupid_Enough_to_Make,_Except_in_a_Courtroom_(part_1)|Arguments No One Would Be Stupid Enough to Make, Except in a Courtroom (part 1)]]
 
* 05/08/13 | [[Blog:Main/Arguments_No_One_Would_Be_Stupid_Enough_to_Make,_Except_in_a_Courtroom_(part_1)|Arguments No One Would Be Stupid Enough to Make, Except in a Courtroom (part 1)]]
 
* 02/18/13 | [[Blog:Main/Advice_from_the_Oregon_Legislature:_If_you_absolutely_have_to_have_sex_with_a_minor,_then._._._.|Advice From The Oregon Legislature: If You Absolutely Have to Have Sex With a Minor, Then...]]
 
* 02/18/13 | [[Blog:Main/Advice_from_the_Oregon_Legislature:_If_you_absolutely_have_to_have_sex_with_a_minor,_then._._._.|Advice From The Oregon Legislature: If You Absolutely Have to Have Sex With a Minor, Then...]]
* 12/04/12 | [[Blog:Main/Forgotten_Favorites:_So,_What_is_the_New_Gridblock_for_Sex_Abuse_II|Forgotten Favorites: So, What is the New Gridblock for Sex Abuse II]]
+
* 12/04/12 | [[Blog:Main/Forgotten_Favorites:_So,_What_is_the_New_Gridblock_for_Sex_Abuse_II%3F]]
 
* 12/03/12 | [[Blog:Main/Third-Party_Standing_and_the_Right_of_17_Year_Olds_to_Have_Intercourse:_Updated|Third-Party Standing and the Right of 17 Year Olds to Have Intercourse]]
 
* 12/03/12 | [[Blog:Main/Third-Party_Standing_and_the_Right_of_17_Year_Olds_to_Have_Intercourse:_Updated|Third-Party Standing and the Right of 17 Year Olds to Have Intercourse]]
* 12/02/12 | [[Blog:Main/Forgotten_Favorites:_Is_it_Possible_to_Be_Convicted_of_a_Sex_Offense_But_Not_Have_to_Register_as_a_Sex_Offender|Forgotten Favorites: Is It Possible to Be Convicted of a Sex Offense But Not Have to Register as a Sex Offender?]]
+
* 12/02/12 | [[Blog:Main/Forgotten_Favorites:_Is_it_Possible_to_Be_Convicted_of_a_Sex_Offense_But_Not_Have_to_Register_as_a_Sex_Offender%3F]]
 
* 10/26/12 | [[Blog:Main/Sex_Crimes_and_Grand_Jury_Notes|Forgotten Favorites: Sex Crimes and Grand Jury Notes]]
 
* 10/26/12 | [[Blog:Main/Sex_Crimes_and_Grand_Jury_Notes|Forgotten Favorites: Sex Crimes and Grand Jury Notes]]
 
* 08/08/12 | [[Blog:Main/Is_Third-Party_Standing_Necessary_for_a_Defendant_to_Assert_a_17_Year_Old%27s_Right_to_Intercourse%3F | Is Third-Party Standing Necessary for a Defendant to Assert a 17 Year Old's Right to Intercourse?]]
 
* 08/08/12 | [[Blog:Main/Is_Third-Party_Standing_Necessary_for_a_Defendant_to_Assert_a_17_Year_Old%27s_Right_to_Intercourse%3F | Is Third-Party Standing Necessary for a Defendant to Assert a 17 Year Old's Right to Intercourse?]]
Line 87: Line 87:
  
 
* 03/30/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Attempted_Burglary_Demurrer-Motion_to_Strike|The Attempted Burglary Demurrer Motion to Strike]]
 
* 03/30/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Attempted_Burglary_Demurrer-Motion_to_Strike|The Attempted Burglary Demurrer Motion to Strike]]
* 03/13/12 | [[Blog:Main/What_does_today%27s_kidnapping_opinion_have_to_do_with_ID_Theft|What Does Kidnapping Opinion Have To Do With ID Theft]]
+
* 03/13/12 | [[Blog:Main/What_does_today%27s_kidnapping_opinion_have_to_do_with_ID_Theft%3F]]
 
* 11/22/11 | [[Blog:Main/Felony_Computer_Crime:_Defense,_Sentencing_Argument|Felony Computer Crime]]  
 
* 11/22/11 | [[Blog:Main/Felony_Computer_Crime:_Defense,_Sentencing_Argument|Felony Computer Crime]]  
 
* 07/04/11 | [[Blog:Main/6_Crimes_With_Proportionality_Problems:_Revisiting_Them_in_Light_of_the_Simonson_Opinion|6 Crimes with Proportionality Problems]]   
 
* 07/04/11 | [[Blog:Main/6_Crimes_With_Proportionality_Problems:_Revisiting_Them_in_Light_of_the_Simonson_Opinion|6 Crimes with Proportionality Problems]]   
Line 100: Line 100:
 
* 04/03/13 | [[Blog:Main/Blakely_and_Merger|Blakely and Merger]]
 
* 04/03/13 | [[Blog:Main/Blakely_and_Merger|Blakely and Merger]]
 
* 01/06/13 | [[Blog:Main/Merger_for_Seniors:_recklessly_endangering,_assault_and_car_accidents|Merger for Seniors: recklessly endangering, assault and car accidents]]
 
* 01/06/13 | [[Blog:Main/Merger_for_Seniors:_recklessly_endangering,_assault_and_car_accidents|Merger for Seniors: recklessly endangering, assault and car accidents]]
* 12/05/12 | [[Blog:Blog:Main/The_Next_Big_Merger_Issue:_ECSA_and_ID_Theft|The Next Big Merger Issue: ECSA and ID Theft]]
+
* 12/05/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Next_Big_Merger_Issue:_ECSA_and_ID_Theft]]
 
* 11/12/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Best_Argument_Ever_for_Merger_of_DCS-MCS_and_PCS|The Best Argument Ever for Merger of DCS-MCS and PCS]]
 
* 11/12/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Best_Argument_Ever_for_Merger_of_DCS-MCS_and_PCS|The Best Argument Ever for Merger of DCS-MCS and PCS]]
 
* 10/25/12 | [[Blog:Main/Brand_New_Merger_Argument|Brand New Merger Argument]]
 
* 10/25/12 | [[Blog:Main/Brand_New_Merger_Argument|Brand New Merger Argument]]
Line 115: Line 115:
 
==Criminal Episodes==
 
==Criminal Episodes==
  
* 08/31/13 | [[Blog:Main/Are_a_majority_of_co-defendant_indictments_fatally_flawed|Are A Majority of Co-Defendant Indictments Fatally Flawed?]]
+
* 08/31/13 | [[Blog:Main/Are_a_majority_of_co-defendant_indictments_fatally_flawed%3F]]
 
* 07/24/13 | [[Blog:Main/Remember_I_told_you_about_the_demurrer_that_never_loses%3F_Well,_it_._._._um_._._._lost|Remember I Told You About the Demurrer That Never Loses? Well, It... Um... Lost]]
 
* 07/24/13 | [[Blog:Main/Remember_I_told_you_about_the_demurrer_that_never_loses%3F_Well,_it_._._._um_._._._lost|Remember I Told You About the Demurrer That Never Loses? Well, It... Um... Lost]]
 
* 07/10/13 | [[Blog:Main/An_Analog_to_the_Improper_Joinder_Demurrer|An Analog to the Improper Joinder Demurrer]]
 
* 07/10/13 | [[Blog:Main/An_Analog_to_the_Improper_Joinder_Demurrer|An Analog to the Improper Joinder Demurrer]]
Line 158: Line 158:
 
* 06/05/13 | [[Blog:Main/Search_Incident_to_Arrest:_When_There%27s_a_Gap_Between_the_Crime_and_the_Arrest|Search Incident to Arrest: When There's a Gap Between the Crime and the Arrest]]
 
* 06/05/13 | [[Blog:Main/Search_Incident_to_Arrest:_When_There%27s_a_Gap_Between_the_Crime_and_the_Arrest|Search Incident to Arrest: When There's a Gap Between the Crime and the Arrest]]
 
* 06/05/13 | [[Blog:Main/Arguments_No_One_Would_Make_Except_in_a_Courtroom,_Part_2|Arguments No One Would Make Except in a Courtroom, Part 2]]  
 
* 06/05/13 | [[Blog:Main/Arguments_No_One_Would_Make_Except_in_a_Courtroom,_Part_2|Arguments No One Would Make Except in a Courtroom, Part 2]]  
* 05/14/13 | [[Blog:Main/Iowa_finds_parole_condition_unconstitutional;_why_should_you_care|Iowa Finds Parole Condition Unconstitutional; Why Should You Care?]]  
+
* 05/14/13 | [[Blog:Main/Iowa_finds_parole_condition_unconstitutional;_why_should_you_care%3F]]  
 
* 09/12/12 | [[Blog:Main/Often:__The_Search_Warrant's_Achilles_Heel|Often: The Search Warrant's Achilles Heel]]  
 
* 09/12/12 | [[Blog:Main/Often:__The_Search_Warrant's_Achilles_Heel|Often: The Search Warrant's Achilles Heel]]  
 
* 03/17/12 | [[Blog:Main/Strategy_Tip_for_Suppressing_Statements|Strategy Tip for Suppressing Statements]]  
 
* 03/17/12 | [[Blog:Main/Strategy_Tip_for_Suppressing_Statements|Strategy Tip for Suppressing Statements]]  
Line 187: Line 187:
 
==Sentence Enhancements==
 
==Sentence Enhancements==
  
* 05/07/13 | [[Blog:Main/Blog:Main/State%27s_Response_to_Upward_Departure_Challenge|State's Response to Upward Departure Challenge]]
+
* 05/07/13 | [[Blog:Main/State%27s_Response_to_Upward_Departure_Challenge]]
 
* 03/14/13 | [[Blog:Main/Due_Process_Entitles_Defendants_to_a_Preliminary_Hearing_or_Indictment_on_Upward_Departure_Factors|Due Process Entitles Defendants to a Preliminary Hearing or Indictment on Upward Departure Factors]]
 
* 03/14/13 | [[Blog:Main/Due_Process_Entitles_Defendants_to_a_Preliminary_Hearing_or_Indictment_on_Upward_Departure_Factors|Due Process Entitles Defendants to a Preliminary Hearing or Indictment on Upward Departure Factors]]
 
* 11/18/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Nonsensical_Distinction:_Elements_and_Sentence_Enhancements|The Nonsensical Distinction: Elements & Sentence Enhancements]]
 
* 11/18/12 | [[Blog:Main/The_Nonsensical_Distinction:_Elements_and_Sentence_Enhancements|The Nonsensical Distinction: Elements & Sentence Enhancements]]

Latest revision as of 10:30, December 3, 2013

Ryan Scott

Ryan Scott is a partner in Scott & Huggins. He frequently speaks and writes about cutting edge legal arguments and complex but essential defense topics like those below. Ryan is a 2011 and 2012 super lawyer and the winner of the 2009 and 2012 OCDLA Presidents Awards.

Contents

[edit] Sex Crimes

[edit] Other Crimes

[edit] Guns

[edit] Drugs

[edit] Assault

[edit] Theft

[edit] Vehicles

[edit] Misc. or Multiple Crimes

[edit] Merger

[edit] Criminal Episodes

[edit] Search and Seizure

[edit] Equal Privileges

[edit] Sentence Enhancements

[edit] Jury Instructions and Mental States

[edit] Restitution

[edit] Evidence

[edit] Miscellaneous