A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Computers

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

by: Ryan Scott • August 22, 2017 • no comments

(Created page with "The first one involves a warrant for a defendant's entire Facebook account. A link to the opinion, and a discussion of its significance by Orin Kerr, can be found [https://ww...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Mr. Kerr's discussion of the second opinion can be found [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/08/22/d-c-circuit-forbids-seizing-all-electronic-storage-devices-in-computer-warrant-cases/?utm_term=.40a339b98ebc here].  The title of this article is:  "D.C. Circuit forbids seizing all electronic storage devices in computer warrant cases"
 
Mr. Kerr's discussion of the second opinion can be found [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/08/22/d-c-circuit-forbids-seizing-all-electronic-storage-devices-in-computer-warrant-cases/?utm_term=.40a339b98ebc here].  The title of this article is:  "D.C. Circuit forbids seizing all electronic storage devices in computer warrant cases"
 
{{wl-publish: 2017-08-22 12:44:32 -0700 | Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com:Ryan  Scott  }}
 
{{wl-publish: 2017-08-22 12:44:32 -0700 | Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com:Ryan  Scott  }}
 +
 +
Additional discussion [http://fourthamendment.com/?p=28666 here] from fourthamendment.com, under the heading, "DC Cir.: The mere fact a person has a cell phone isn’t PC to search it; must be PC evidence would be found"

Latest revision as of 12:52, August 23, 2017

The first one involves a warrant for a defendant's entire Facebook account. A link to the opinion, and a discussion of its significance by Orin Kerr, can be found here.

Mr. Kerr's discussion of the second opinion can be found here. The title of this article is: "D.C. Circuit forbids seizing all electronic storage devices in computer warrant cases"

Additional discussion here from fourthamendment.com, under the heading, "DC Cir.: The mere fact a person has a cell phone isn’t PC to search it; must be PC evidence would be found"