A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

The Missing Witness Inference, An Invited Response and Facts Not In Evidence

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main
Revision as of 12:08, August 10, 2013 by Admin1 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

by: Ryan • December 30, 2010 • no comments

I want to draw your attention to a fascinating, brand new opinion from the Oregon Supreme Court. Both the opinion and the dissent involve thorough discussions of the 3 things in the title of this post. It is a civil case but of great use - as either a sword or a shield, depending on your situation - for every trial attorney, civil or criminal.