A good pro-privacy case involving a pole cam
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan Scott • September 25, 2017 • no comments
(Created page with "Key quote: :Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street fro...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Summary from FourthAmendment.com: | |
:Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that he was involved in drugs. The state, however, gets the benefit of the good faith exception because this is the first time this happened. [http://ujs.sd.gov/uploads/sc/opinions/27739.pdf ''State v. Jones''], 2017 SD 59, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 115 (Sept. 20, 2017). | :Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that he was involved in drugs. The state, however, gets the benefit of the good faith exception because this is the first time this happened. [http://ujs.sd.gov/uploads/sc/opinions/27739.pdf ''State v. Jones''], 2017 SD 59, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 115 (Sept. 20, 2017). | ||
Latest revision as of 10:22, September 26, 2017
Summary from FourthAmendment.com:
- Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that he was involved in drugs. The state, however, gets the benefit of the good faith exception because this is the first time this happened. State v. Jones, 2017 SD 59, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 115 (Sept. 20, 2017).
The rest of the details here.
