A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Court, October 1, 2020

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 09:19, October 10, 2020 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • October 9, 2020 • no comments

 

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

POST-CONVICTION RELIEF - Statute of limitation

Petitioner, who raised an argument supported by a recent decision, but not foreclosed by prior law, was not entitled to escape-clause treatment.

The court explained that a change in the law will permit a late or successive PCR petition only if the change is so novel and surprising that a timely petition could not reasonably have relied on it.

Perez v. Cain 367 Or 96 (October 1, 2020) (Garrett) (Malheur County, Landis)