A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Court, November 15, 2019

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 20:58, November 18, 2019 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • November 17, 2019 • no comments

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

SEARCH AND SEIZURE — Scope of stop

Police officers cannot ask questions about unrelated matters during ordinary traffic stop without an independent constitutional justification. Reversed and remanded.

The court explained that Article I, section 9 includes a subject-matter limitation, in addition to a temporal one.

Garrett, dissenting, would have held that only a temporal limitation was included in Article I, section 9.

State v. Arreola-Botello 365 Or 695 (November 15, 2019) (Nelson, Garrett dissenting) (Washington County, Bailey)