Oregon Supreme Court—November 30, 2017
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Msofia@ocdla.org • December 6, 2017 • no comments
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<summary hidden> | <summary hidden> | ||
| − | '''<big>SEARCH & SEIZURE</big>''' | + | '''<big>SEARCH & SEIZURE</big>''' |
| − | '''Motion to Suppress—Preservation''' | + | *'''Motion to Suppress—Preservation''' |
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| − | '''<big>SEARCH & SEIZURE</big>''' | + | <big>'''Written by Erin Severe, OPDS | Edited by Mary A. Sofia, OCDLA'''</big> |
| + | |||
| + | '''<big>SEARCH & SEIZURE</big>''' | ||
'''Motion to Suppress—Preservation''' | '''Motion to Suppress—Preservation''' | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S065098.pdf State v. Schmidtke], 362 Or 203 (2017) (Per Curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S065098.pdf State v. Schmidtke], 362 Or 203 (2017) (Per Curiam) | ||
| + | {{wl-publish: 2017-12-06 09:41:40 -0800 | Msofia@ocdla.org:Mary A. Sell }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:41, December 7, 2017
Written by Erin Severe, OPDS | Edited by Mary A. Sofia, OCDLA
SEARCH & SEIZURE
Motion to Suppress—Preservation
When defendant moved to suppress all statements he made during an encounter with police, and trial court’s ruling only addressed suppression of defendant’s post-Miranda statements, defendant not required to again request suppression of pre-Miranda statements to preserve that issue for appeal.
State v. Schmidtke, 362 Or 203 (2017) (Per Curiam)
