A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court, December 29, 2021

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 18:59, January 1, 2022 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • December 31, 2021 • no comments

 

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENTS - Dates
Importance: 2/5

Specific date of offense is not material element of driving while suspended. Affirmed.

The indictment alleged an offense date in January, but the state offered evidence that the offense occurred the preceding December. Defendant unsuccessfully argued that he needed the precise date to prepare a defense, because a license is suspended for a specific term.

State v. Arriaga-Mendoza 316 Or App 667 (December 29, 2021) (Mooney) Multnomah County, Roberts)