https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Blog_talk%3AMain%2FSearch_Warrants_for_Touch_ID%2Fc000052Blog talk:Main/Search Warrants for Touch ID/c000052 - Revision history2026-09-10T20:14:48ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.19.24https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog_talk:Main/Search_Warrants_for_Touch_ID/c000052&diff=24121&oldid=prevRyan@ryanscottlaw.com: New comment by Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: I believe implicit in Kerr's example of Case #1 is that the police know that it's the defendant's phone, which is what distinguishes it from Case #2. There is an exception to ...2016-11-28T19:08:27Z<p>New comment by Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: I believe implicit in Kerr's example of Case #1 is that the police know that it's the defendant's phone, which is what distinguishes it from Case #2. There is an exception to ...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I believe implicit in Kerr's example of Case #1 is that the police know that it's the defendant's phone, which is what distinguishes it from Case #2. There is an exception to the warrant requirement -- the technical name escapes me -- for something that merely reveals what is already known. Now that's going to bug me all day until I can remember what the name of that exception is.</div>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com