https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Blog_talk%3AMain%2FSearch_Warrants_for_Touch_ID%2Fc000051Blog talk:Main/Search Warrants for Touch ID/c000051 - Revision history2026-09-10T20:22:18ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.19.24https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog_talk:Main/Search_Warrants_for_Touch_ID/c000051&diff=24079&oldid=prevRussell@barnettlegaldefense.com: New comment by Russell@barnettlegaldefense.com: Ryan, Couldn't one (validly) argue that in case 1, the act of providing the "opening fingerprint" is causing the individual to validate ownership/dominion/control over the devi...2016-11-12T00:47:52Z<p>New comment by Russell@barnettlegaldefense.com: Ryan, Couldn't one (validly) argue that in case 1, the act of providing the "opening fingerprint" is causing the individual to validate ownership/dominion/control over the devi...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Ryan,<br />
Couldn't one (validly) argue that in case 1, the act of providing the "opening fingerprint" is causing the individual to validate ownership/dominion/control over the device? It seems akin to the LEO's finding a bag of child pornography and forcing the suspected owner/possessor to acknowledge ownership/dominion/control/access to the bag-o-porn? I guessing I am missing something here.<br />
Russell</div>Russell@barnettlegaldefense.com