https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Blog_talk%3AMain%2FECSA%3A_downloading_is_not_duplication%2Fc000003 2026-09-14T21:10:44Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.19.24 https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog_talk:Main/ECSA:_downloading_is_not_duplication/c000003&diff=10264&oldid=prev 2013-02-03T23:31:49Z

<p>New comment by Abassos: If I ask you to make a copy of a magazine for me (and you do so), I have participated in the duplication of that thing without possessing it. It&#039;s not even aiding and abettin...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>If I ask you to make a copy of a magazine for me (and you do so), I have participated in the duplication of that thing without possessing it. It's not even aiding and abetting since I directed the action. This doesn't change if I've paid you to make a copy of the magazine for me, I presume. I'm still directing the duplication without possession. So what's different about ordering a magazine from a company, assuming I know that they're going to print another copy as a result of my request? Haven't I directed them to duplicate the magazine? <br /> <br /> What am I missing?</div>

Abassos@mpdlaw.com