Blog:Main/Unanimous Juries - Revision history

127.0.0.1 at 02:14, December 21, 2012

2012-12-21T02:14:49Z

127.0.0.1 at 02:14, December 21, 2012

2012-12-21T02:14:40Z

Maintenance script: Importing text file

2012-12-21T02:08:13Z

Importing text file

Maintenance script: Importing text file

2012-12-21T00:28:42Z

Importing text file

New page

Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[Blog:Main/unanimous_Jury_Issue|unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.

Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief:

<blockquote>

''The Oregon Department of Justice recently attempted to quantify non-unanimous jury verdicts, and while not definitive the summary indicated that of the 662 trial cases surveyed, juries were polled in the 63% of the cases and just over 65% of the polls were non-unanimous on at least one count.''

</blockquote>
{{wl-publish: 2010-12-14 21:00:00 -0800 | abassos }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, December 21, 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[Blog:Main/The_Unanimous_Jury_Issue unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.	+	Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[Blog:Main/The_Unanimous_Jury_Issue\|unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.

	Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief:		Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief:

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, December 21, 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[/~~content/unanimous-jury-issue~~ unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.	+	Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[Blog:Main/The_Unanimous_Jury_Issue unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.

	Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief:		Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief:

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, December 21, 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[~~Blog:Main~~/~~unanimous_Jury_Issue\|~~unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.	+	Just a reminder that you can find everything on the [[/content/unanimous-jury-issue unanimous jury argument here]]. Including but not limited to a pair of unanimous jury memos ready for you to file, as well as all the briefs in ''Herrera'' (linked from Eugene Volokh's site.) Volokh's reply brief is a particularly good read. As Ryan Scott pointed out, it's a lovely example of concise and devastating argument.

	Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief:		Check out this crazy statistic from the Oregon Federal Public Defender's amicus brief: