Blog:Main/UUW, Gun Minimum and Merger - Revision history

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:23, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:23:05Z

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:22, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:22:47Z

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:22, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:22:26Z

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:21, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:21:06Z

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:20, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:20:49Z

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:20, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:20:29Z

Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:19, August 11, 2015

2015-08-11T21:19:19Z

Admin1: Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}"

2013-08-09T19:09:07Z

Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}"

Maintenance script: Importing text file

2012-12-21T02:06:01Z

Importing text file

Maintenance script: Importing text file

2012-12-21T00:26:40Z

Importing text file

New page

I have previously written two posts ([http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/merging-uuw-and-felon-in-possession/ here] and [http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/merging-felon-in-possession-and-unlawful-use-of-a-weapon/ here]) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.

Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[Gun_Minimum_Uuw_And_Merger1.doc|Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.

Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
{{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
-Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
+Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
 Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
 {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
-Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
+Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
 Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
 {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
-Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[media: gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
+Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
 Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
 {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
-Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[media:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
+Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[media: gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
 Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
 {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
-Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
+Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[media:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
 Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
 {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, August 11, 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I have previously written two posts ([~~http~~://~~mpdtrainer~~.~~wordpress~~.~~com~~/~~2011/01/02/merging-uuw-and-felon-in-possession~~/ here] and [~~http~~://~~mpdtrainer~~.~~wordpress~~.~~com~~/~~2011/02/25/merging-felon-in-possession-and-unlawful-use-of-a-weapon~~/ here]) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.	+	I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.

	Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[http://libraryofdefense.org/sites/default/files/gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.		Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[http://libraryofdefense.org/sites/default/files/gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, August 9, 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.		Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
−	{{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 \| Ryan }}	+	{{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 \| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I have previously written two posts ([http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/merging-uuw-and-felon-in-possession/ here] and [http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/merging-felon-in-possession-and-unlawful-use-of-a-weapon/ here]) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
-Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[Gun_Minimum_Uuw_And_Merger1.doc|Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
+Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[http://libraryofdefense.org/sites/default/files/gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
 Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
 {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }}