<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3AMain%2FToday%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News</id>
		<title>Blog:Main/Today's Oregon Supreme Court News - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3AMain%2FToday%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-09-27T06:51:09Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.24</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;diff=19459&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com at 19:24, June 5, 2015</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;diff=19459&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-06-05T19:24:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
			&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 19:24, June 5, 2015&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 7:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 7:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;summary&amp;gt;And most significant of all, the Supreme Court allowed review in St v J.C.N.-V, and the question presented is:&amp;lt;/summary&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;summary&amp;gt;And most significant of all, the Supreme Court allowed review in St v J.C.N.-V, and the question presented is:&amp;lt;/summary&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;:Whether ORS 419C.352 and ORS 419C.349, which permit the juvenile court to waive a youth under the age of 15 years into circuit court for prosecution as an adult if (among other things) the juvenile court finds that &amp;quot;[t]he youth at the time of the alleged&amp;#160; offense was of sufficient sophistication and maturity to appreciate the nature and quality of the conduct involved,&amp;quot; &amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;:Whether ORS 419C.352 and ORS 419C.349, which permit the juvenile court to waive a youth under the age of 15 years into circuit court for prosecution as an adult if (among other things) the juvenile court finds that &amp;quot;[t]he youth at the time of the alleged&amp;#160; offense was of sufficient sophistication and maturity to appreciate the nature and quality of the conduct involved,&amp;quot; limit the court's discretion to waive youth into circuit court to only youth so developmentally impaired that they did not understand the physical nature of their act, or that they could be in trouble for committing it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;limit the court's discretion to waive youth into circuit court to only youth so developmentally impaired that they did not understand the physical nature of their act, or that they could be in trouble for committing it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{wl-publish: 2015-06-05 12:24:21 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan&amp;#160; Scott&amp;#160; }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{wl-publish: 2015-06-05 12:24:21 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan&amp;#160; Scott&amp;#160; }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;diff=19458&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com at 19:24, June 5, 2015</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;diff=19458&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-06-05T19:24:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
			&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 19:24, June 5, 2015&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 7:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 7:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;summary&amp;gt;And most significant of all, the Supreme Court allowed review in St v J.C.N.-V, and the question presented is:&amp;lt;/summary&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;summary&amp;gt;And most significant of all, the Supreme Court allowed review in St v J.C.N.-V, and the question presented is:&amp;lt;/summary&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;:Whether ORS 419C.352 and ORS 419C.349, which permit the juvenile court to waive a youth under the age of 15 years into circuit court for prosecution as an adult if (among other things) &amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;:Whether ORS 419C.352 and ORS 419C.349, which permit the juvenile court to waive a youth under the age of 15 years into circuit court for prosecution as an adult if (among other things) the juvenile court finds that &amp;quot;[t]he youth at the time of the alleged&amp;#160; offense was of sufficient sophistication and maturity to appreciate the nature and quality of the conduct involved,&amp;quot; &amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;the juvenile court finds that &amp;quot;[t]he youth at the time of the alleged&amp;#160; offense was of sufficient sophistication and maturity to appreciate the nature and quality of the conduct involved,&amp;quot; &amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;limit the court's discretion to waive youth into circuit court to only youth so developmentally impaired that they did not understand the physical nature of their act, or that they could be in trouble for committing it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;limit the court's discretion to waive youth into circuit court to only youth so developmentally impaired that they did not understand the physical nature of their act, or that they could be in trouble for committing it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{wl-publish: 2015-06-05 12:24:21 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan&amp;#160; Scott&amp;#160; }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{wl-publish: 2015-06-05 12:24:21 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan&amp;#160; Scott&amp;#160; }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;diff=19457&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with &quot;The Oregon Supreme Court granted review of the recent COA computer crime opinion I discussed here.  Prime opportunity for Orin K...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Today%27s_Oregon_Supreme_Court_News&amp;diff=19457&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-06-05T19:24:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;The Oregon Supreme Court granted review of the recent COA computer crime opinion I discussed &lt;a href=&quot;/Blog:Main/Unauthorized_Access_of_Computers&quot; title=&quot;Blog:Main/Unauthorized Access of Computers&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;  Prime opportunity for Orin K...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Oregon Supreme Court granted review of the recent COA computer crime opinion I discussed [[Blog:Main/Unauthorized_Access_of_Computers|here.]]  Prime opportunity for Orin Kerr's Columbia Law Review article to be highly influential.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme's also granted review to the ''Simonov'' case, which means the appropriate mental state(s) for UUV could change sometime next year.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supremes denied review of ''State v. Antoine,'' still the most important sex abuse case you could read this year.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;summary&amp;gt;And most significant of all, the Supreme Court allowed review in St v J.C.N.-V, and the question presented is:&amp;lt;/summary&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whether ORS 419C.352 and ORS 419C.349, which permit the juvenile court to waive a youth under the age of 15 years into circuit court for prosecution as an adult if (among other things) &lt;br /&gt;
the juvenile court finds that &amp;quot;[t]he youth at the time of the alleged  offense was of sufficient sophistication and maturity to appreciate the nature and quality of the conduct involved,&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
limit the court's discretion to waive youth into circuit court to only youth so developmentally impaired that they did not understand the physical nature of their act, or that they could be in trouble for committing it.&lt;br /&gt;
{{wl-publish: 2015-06-05 12:24:21 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan  Scott  }}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>