Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com at 16:33, March 24, 2015

2015-03-24T16:33:20Z

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with "If there is one blog post I've written that I think is the most valuable, it's the one [[https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Voluntariness_of_a_Shaken_Baby_Confession..."

2015-03-24T16:17:33Z

Created page with "If there is one blog post I've written that I think is the most valuable, it's the one [[https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Voluntariness_of_a_Shaken_Baby_Confession..."

New page

If there is one blog post I've written that I think is the most valuable, it's the one [[https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Voluntariness_of_a_Shaken_Baby_Confession|here.]] It not only discusses some interesting issues about confessions in the context of a shaken baby case, it also was amended to include links that address some issues related to the disputed science that is relied upon by the state to charge shaken baby cases. Here's one more, from the March 20,2015, edition of the Washington Post, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/shaken-baby-syndrome/ "Prosecutors build murder cases on disputed Shaken Baby Syndrome diagnosis."]

I am quite confident that there are prosecutors who, based on the flawed science, have sent innocent people to prison. Alas, I don't think we'll ever see a letter like [http://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/readers/2015/03/20/lead-prosecutor-offers-apology-in-the-case-of-exonerated-death-row-inmate-glenn-ford/25049063/ this one.] In fact, I think even suggesting to a prosecutor that at some point in their life, they'll likely have reason to write a letter like this, would earn nothing but their anger.
{{wl-publish: 2015-03-24 09:17:33 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-If there is one blog post I've written that I think is the most valuable, it's the one [[https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Voluntariness_of_a_Shaken_Baby_Confession|here.]]  It not only discusses some interesting issues about confessions in the context of a shaken baby case, it also was amended to include links that address some issues related to the disputed science that is relied upon by the state to charge shaken baby cases.    Here's one more, from the March 20,2015, edition of the Washington Post, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/shaken-baby-syndrome/ "Prosecutors build murder cases on disputed Shaken Baby Syndrome diagnosis."]
+If there is one blog post I've written that I think is the most valuable, it's [[Blog:Main/Voluntariness_of_a_Shaken_Baby_Confession|this one.]]   It not only discusses some interesting issues about confessions in the context of a shaken baby case, it also was amended to include links that address some issues related to the disputed science that is relied upon by the state to charge shaken baby cases.    Here's one more, from the March 20,2015, edition of the Washington Post, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/shaken-baby-syndrome/ "Prosecutors build murder cases on disputed Shaken Baby Syndrome diagnosis."]
 I am quite confident that there are prosecutors who, based on the flawed science, have sent innocent people to prison.  Alas, I don't think we'll ever see a letter like [http://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/readers/2015/03/20/lead-prosecutor-offers-apology-in-the-case-of-exonerated-death-row-inmate-glenn-ford/25049063/ this one.]  In fact, I think even suggesting to a prosecutor that at some point in their life, they'll likely have reason to write a letter like this, would earn nothing but their anger.
 {{wl-publish: 2015-03-24 09:17:33 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan  Scott  }}

Blog:Main/Shaken Baby Science, Part V - Revision history

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com at 16:33, March 24, 2015

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with "If there is one blog post I've written that I think is the most valuable, it's the one [[https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Voluntariness_of_a_Shaken_Baby_Confession..."