Blog:Main/Other Crimes with Vertical Proportionality Problems - Revision history

Admin1: Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}"

2013-08-09T19:06:25Z

Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}"

Maintenance script: Importing text file

2012-12-21T02:04:49Z

Importing text file

Maintenance script: Importing text file

2012-12-21T00:25:29Z

Importing text file

New page

The [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A141269.htm ''Simonson'' opinion] said that Sex Abuse II, under a ''Stamper ''theory of conviction, presented "the textbook example of the principle of vertical proportionality."

What are other crimes that might have the same problem? ''See'' [[Blog:Main/statutes_Vertical_Proportionality_Problems|this blog post from February 3, 2011]]. It discusses the crimes of Online Sexual Corruption of a Minor and Possession of a Precursor Substance.

Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison.
{{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, August 9, 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison.		Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison.
−	{{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 \| Ryan }}	+	{{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 \| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A141269.htm ''Simonson'' opinion] said that Sex Abuse II, under a ''Stamper ''theory of conviction, presented "the textbook example of the principle of vertical proportionality."
-What are other crimes that might have the same problem? ''See'' [[Blog:Main/statutes_Vertical_Proportionality_Problems|this blog post from February 3, 2011]]. It discusses the crimes of Online Sexual Corruption of a Minor and Possession of a Precursor Substance.
+What are other crimes that might have the same problem? ''See'' [[Blog:Main/Statutes_with_Vertical_Proportionality_Problems |  this blog post from February 3, 2011]]. It discusses the crimes of Online Sexual Corruption of a Minor and Possession of a Precursor Substance.
 Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison.
 {{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }}