Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with "Whenever you receive an upward departure notice, you should review the relevant OARs, which can be found [http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars_200/oar_213/213_008.ht..."

2017-08-30T19:07:10Z

Created page with "Whenever you receive an upward departure notice, you should review the relevant OARs, which can be found [http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars_200/oar_213/213_008.ht..."

New page

Whenever you receive an upward departure notice, you should review the relevant OARs, which can be found [http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars_200/oar_213/213_008.html here.]

This is because the OARs may provide a defense that isn't obvious from the notice. For example, the OAR on vulnerable victim is quite explicit that the defendant must have known of the specific vulnerability. Further, it's not enough that the person is "vulnerable" but that the vulnerability "increased the harm or threat of harm." That will not be true in all cases. I also like the use of the word "extreme." In the context of age, I'm inclined to think that 14 isn't an ''extreme'' age. Nor is seventy.

:(B) The offender knew or had reason to know of the victim's particular vulnerability, such as the extreme youth, age, disability or ill health of victim, which increased the harm or threat of harm caused by the criminal conduct.

Also of note is the limitation on the "multiple victims" enhancement.

:(G) The offense involved multiple victims or incidents. This factor may not be cited when it is captured in a consecutive sentence.

In certain cases, that second sentence is key.
{{wl-publish: 2017-08-30 12:07:10 -0700 | Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com:Ryan Scott }}

Blog:Main/More upward departure challenges - Revision history

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with "Whenever you receive an upward departure notice, you should review the relevant OARs, which can be found [http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars_200/oar_213/213_008.ht..."