https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Blog%3AMain%2FDon%27t_flip_out%21_Spring_for_the_smart_phone%21 2026-04-08T23:39:53Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.19.24 https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Don%27t_flip_out!_Spring_for_the_smart_phone!&diff=16790&oldid=prev 2014-04-29T21:54:30Z

<p></p> <table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr valign='top'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 21:54, April 29, 2014</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Here are two (similar) impressions of today's arguments involving cell phone searches at the United States Supreme Court:</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Here are two (similar) impressions of today's arguments <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">(</ins>involving cell phone searches<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">) </ins>at the United States Supreme Court:</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>[http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/argument-analysis-limiting-a-search-sure-but-how/ SCOTUSblog]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>[http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/argument-analysis-limiting-a-search-sure-but-how/ SCOTUSblog]</div></td></tr> </table>

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/Don%27t_flip_out!_Spring_for_the_smart_phone!&diff=16789&oldid=prev 2014-04-29T21:50:43Z

<p>Created page with &quot;Here are two (similar) impressions of today&#039;s arguments involving cell phone searches at the United States Supreme Court: [http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/argument-analysis...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Here are two (similar) impressions of today's arguments involving cell phone searches at the United States Supreme Court:<br /> <br /> [http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/argument-analysis-limiting-a-search-sure-but-how/ SCOTUSblog]<br /> <br /> and<br /> <br /> [http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/04/29/initial-impressions-from-the-oral-argument-in-the-supreme-court-cell-phone-search-cases/ Volokh Conspiracy].<br /> <br /> &lt;summary&gt;Both summaries are in agreement that the court is inclined to substantially greater protections for smart phones rather than flip phones. So if you'd prefer a little more freedom from gov't scrutiny, and your chances of being arrested are a little more than trivial, then I'd strongly recommend spending the extra money for a smart phone. That said, still no good reason for taking selfies in gang colors making gang signs. &lt;/summary&gt;<br /> <br /> Both summaries suggest the difficulty there will be in crafting a rule that strikes the right balance and can be reasonably applied in the field. Note further that in both cases, no warrant was involved.<br /> <br /> We'll have an answer pretty quickly. By July, most likely. <br /> <br /> If you want to read the transcripts of today's oral arguments, you can find them [http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/todays-transcripts-187/ here].<br /> {{wl-publish: 2014-04-29 14:50:43 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }}</div>

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com