Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with "[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3141086 New draft article] by Orin Kerr. Opening paragraph of abstract: :This Article considers whether government agent..."

2018-03-15T23:01:26Z

Created page with "[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3141086 New draft article] by Orin Kerr. Opening paragraph of abstract: :This Article considers whether government agent..."

New page

[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3141086 New draft article] by Orin Kerr. Opening paragraph of abstract:

:This Article considers whether government agents can conduct searches or seizures to enforce a different government’s law. For example, can federal officers make stops based on state traffic violations? Can state police search for evidence of federal immigration crimes? Lower courts are deeply divided on the answers. The Supreme Court’s decisions offer little useful guidance because they rest on doctrinal assumptions that the Court has since squarely rejected. The answer to a fundamental question of Fourth Amendment law – who can enforce what law – is remarkably unclear.
{{wl-publish: 2018-03-15 16:01:26 -0700 | Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com:Ryan Scott }}

Blog:Main/Cross-Enforcement of the 4th Amendment - Revision history

Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with "[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3141086 New draft article] by Orin Kerr. Opening paragraph of abstract: :This Article considers whether government agent..."