<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3AMain%2FA_couple_of_notable_petitions_for_cert</id>
		<title>Blog:Main/A couple of notable petitions for cert - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3AMain%2FA_couple_of_notable_petitions_for_cert"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/A_couple_of_notable_petitions_for_cert&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-09-21T23:49:10Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.24</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/A_couple_of_notable_petitions_for_cert&amp;diff=26310&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com: Created page with &quot;From SCOTUSblog:  ''Asboth v. Wisconsin ''17-781  Issue: Whether standardized criteria must guide police discretion to seize a vehicle without a warrant or probable cause afte...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Main/A_couple_of_notable_petitions_for_cert&amp;diff=26310&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-12-22T17:52:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;From SCOTUSblog:  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Asboth v. Wisconsin &amp;#039;&amp;#039;17-781  Issue: Whether standardized criteria must guide police discretion to seize a vehicle without a warrant or probable cause afte...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;From SCOTUSblog:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Asboth v. Wisconsin&lt;br /&gt;
''17-781&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Whether standardized criteria must guide police discretion to seize a vehicle without a warrant or probable cause after its operator has been taken into police custody.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Quarles v. United States&lt;br /&gt;
''17-778&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Whether Taylor v. United States’ definition of generic burglary requires proof that intent to commit a crime was present at the time of unlawful entry or first unlawful remaining, as two circuits hold; or whether it is enough that the defendant formed the intent to commit a crime at any time while “remaining in” the building or structure, as the court below and three other circuits hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neither have been granted yet.&lt;br /&gt;
{{wl-publish: 2017-12-22 09:52:12 -0800 | Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com:Ryan  Scott  }}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>