<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3ACase_Reviews%2FOregon_Supreme_Court_November_30%2C_2012</id>
		<title>Blog:Case Reviews/Oregon Supreme Court November 30, 2012 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3ACase_Reviews%2FOregon_Supreme_Court_November_30%2C_2012"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Supreme_Court_November_30,_2012&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-30T07:16:54Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.24</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Supreme_Court_November_30,_2012&amp;diff=13202&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Abassos@mpdlaw.com at 21:23, August 18, 2013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Supreme_Court_November_30,_2012&amp;diff=13202&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2013-08-18T21:23:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
			&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 21:23, August 18, 2013&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 3:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A victim has the right to refuse discovery requests under Article I, section 42. But when a trial court holds that a defendant cannot gain access to a victim's discovery, the victim cannot withhold a sealed copy of the discovery from the record to prevent review. Here, the trial court prohibited defendant's access to a copy of the victim's Google search on the night of the alleged sexual assault. The Court holds that the victim must provide a sealed copy to preserve appeal of the trial court's decision. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S060840.pdf State v. Bray], __ Or __ (2012).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;A victim has the right to refuse discovery requests under Article I, section 42. But when a trial court holds that a defendant cannot gain access to a victim's discovery, the victim cannot withhold a sealed copy of the discovery from the record to prevent review. Here, the trial court prohibited defendant's access to a copy of the victim's Google search on the night of the alleged sexual assault. The Court holds that the victim must provide a sealed copy to preserve appeal of the trial court's decision. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S060840.pdf State v. Bray], __ Or __ (2012).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{wl-publish: 2012-11-30 16:34:22 -0800 | sclark }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{wl-publish: 2012-11-30 16:34:22 -0800 | sclark }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;{{wl-publish: 2012-11-30 16:34:22 -0800 | abassos }}&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Abassos@mpdlaw.com</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Supreme_Court_November_30,_2012&amp;diff=7916&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Maintenance script: Importing text file</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Supreme_Court_November_30,_2012&amp;diff=7916&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-12-21T00:23:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Importing text file&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;'''A victim does not have the right to withhold records necessary to preserve the trial court record for appeal.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A victim has the right to refuse discovery requests under Article I, section 42. But when a trial court holds that a defendant cannot gain access to a victim's discovery, the victim cannot withhold a sealed copy of the discovery from the record to prevent review. Here, the trial court prohibited defendant's access to a copy of the victim's Google search on the night of the alleged sexual assault. The Court holds that the victim must provide a sealed copy to preserve appeal of the trial court's decision. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S060840.pdf State v. Bray], __ Or __ (2012).&lt;br /&gt;
{{wl-publish: 2012-11-30 16:34:22 -0800 | sclark }}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Maintenance script</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>