https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Blog%3ACase_Reviews%2FOregon_Court_of_Appeals_02-03-10 2026-06-19T00:18:52Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.19.24 https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Court_of_Appeals_02-03-10&diff=7816&oldid=prev 2012-12-21T00:21:57Z

<p>Importing text file</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>''Read the full article for details about the following new cases:''<br /> * Felon in Possession - Demurrer<br /> * Theft - Mental State<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Felon in Possession - Demurrer===<br /> <br /> A Felon in Possession indictment is not vulnerable to demurrer merely because it fails to allege that the defendant knew he was a felon. It is enough that the indictment tracks the language of the statute because the statutory language advises the defendant of the charges and allows him to prepare a defense.<br /> [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A135502.htm State v. Anderson]<br /> <br /> ===Theft - Mental State===<br /> <br /> The state is not required to prove that the defendant knew the merchandise was worth the statutorily required amount to make a theft II or I. Per Curiam opinion citing [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A132275.htm State v. Jones].<br /> [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A138369.htm State v. Davis]<br /> <br /> <br /> {{wl-publish: 2010-02-02 21:00:00 -0800 | abassos }}</div>

Maintenance script