<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3ACase_Reviews%2FOregon_Appellate_Court_September_6%2C_2012</id>
		<title>Blog:Case Reviews/Oregon Appellate Court September 6, 2012 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Blog%3ACase_Reviews%2FOregon_Appellate_Court_September_6%2C_2012"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Appellate_Court_September_6,_2012&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-04T10:08:42Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.24</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Appellate_Court_September_6,_2012&amp;diff=7812&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Maintenance script: Importing text file</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Appellate_Court_September_6,_2012&amp;diff=7812&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2012-12-21T00:21:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Importing text file&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;'''Impartial Magistrate &amp;amp;gt; Inception Order Not Unlawful When Issued by Judge Previously Assigned to Case as DA'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A judge who signs a body-wire order for a case to which he was assigned years earlier as a DA does not lack the &amp;quot;neutrality and detachment&amp;quot; required for the issuance of such an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court assumes that the &amp;quot;neutral and detached&amp;quot; standard required of judges issuing warrants also applies to inception orders. Here, the issuing judge-years earlier assigned to the gang-related murder case as a DA-was sufficiently &amp;quot;neutral and detached&amp;quot; because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. He was &amp;quot;severed and disengaged&amp;quot; from law enforcement activity. He had no affiliation with law enforcement at the time that he reviewed the order application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Under an objective appraisal of &amp;quot;psychological tendencies and human weakness,&amp;quot; his previous involvement in the investigation-viewing the crime scene, attending an autopsy, and acting as assigned attorney-did not amount to unconstitutional bias. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/Publications/A139382.pdf State v. Hale], __ Or App __ (2012).&lt;br /&gt;
{{wl-publish: 2012-09-06 12:07:27 -0700 | sclark }}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Maintenance script</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>