https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Blog%3ACase_Reviews%2FOregon_Appellate_Court_06-08-11 2026-05-30T03:14:18Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.19.24 https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Appellate_Court_06-08-11&diff=7756&oldid=prev 2012-12-21T00:21:05Z

<p>Importing text file</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>''Read the full article for details about the following new cases:''<br /> * Dependency - Child Endangerment - Child Pornography<br /> <br /> Possession of child pornography is not sufficient in itself for a finding of child endangerment. The state did not make a sufficient showing that a threat of exposure to pornographic images is harmful enough to children to justify a finding of endangerment. In addition, the mere fact that the father possessed images of child pornography was not enough by itself to show that the father posed a harm to his children.<br /> [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A147231.htm ''In the Matter of T.F.'']<br /> <br /> <br /> {{wl-publish: 2011-06-07 21:00:00 -0700 | abassos }}</div>

Maintenance script